Haecceitas as Value and as Moral Horizon: A Scotist Contribution to the Project of a Phenomenological Ethics

Haecceitas as Value and as Moral Horizon: A Scotist Contribution to the Project of a Phenomenological Ethics
of 34

Please download to get full document.

View again

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Tags
Transcript
  Haecceitas as Value and as Moral Horizon: A Scotist Contribution to the Project of a Phenomenological Ethics William E. Tullius Abstract  . This aer see!s to ro"ide a henomenological articulation of the Scotist notion of haecceitas# interreting Scotus$ rincile of indi"iduation at once as an ontological as %ell as a moral rincile. &ro%ing out of certain suggestions made b' (ames Hart in his Who One Is # this interretation is meant to ro"ide the  henomenological ethics of both Edmund Husserl and Ma) Scheler %ith a useful theoretical tool in the Scotist notion of haecceitas interreted as a horizon of "alue in order more full' to de"elo the henomenological idea of the ethical life as a tas! %hich secificall' see!s to realize as its highest goal the "ocation of the erson to his or her ideal# true self. The main imlication of Scotus$ thought# here# for henomenolog' %ill  be the abilit' to further delimit haecceitas as an objecti"e moral rincile %hich refutes the fre*uent charge of relati"istic subjecti"ism in the henomenological theor' of ethics.+.  Introduction . The follo%ing aer is an attemt to engage %ith the Husserlian and Schelerian henomenological aroaches to ethics. ,ithin these t%o thin!ers# the *uestion of the ethical life is understood as arising out of the ultimate *uestion of one$s uni*ue -"ocation or -destin' as the highest e)ression of both the realit' and the  ossibilit' of -%ho one is in one$s uni*ue "alue/essence and ideal caabilities as the idea of m' -true self. 0  1or the henomenologists# the concet of m' ersonal self 0 1or Husserl see Edmund Husserl# Gesammelte Werke Husserliana: Aufsätze und Vorträe !"#""$"#%"& # ed. Thomas 2enon and Hans 3ainer Se 45ordrecht: Martinus  2 reresents an ideal %ith normati"e6moral dimensions7i.e. as the "alue/essence %hich stands as an ideal ought calling me to its realization. The henomenologists$ engagement %ith the moral life b' %a' of one$s -ersonal calling or -"ocation# then# in"ol"es a comle) theor' of one$s ersonal relation to one$s self/"alue. This self/"alue is# in e"er' case# %holl' uni*ue. +t must be connected to %hat %e can describe as the horizon of indi"idual selfhood# or %ith %hat (ohn 5uns Scotus %ould call# the haecceitas %hich indi"iduates one as -this uni*ue erson %ith -this true essence.3ecentl'# (ames Hart has attemted to resol"e certain theoretical difficulties and comle)ities %hich arise %hen one situates the normati"it' and the goal of the ethical tas! %ithin %holl' uni*ue ethical rinciles %hich# because the' are %holl' uni*ue# might seem to lead ethics to%ards a !ind of relati"istic subjecti"ism. 8ne of the %a's in %hich Hart attemts to resol"e the difficult' raised b' this notion of the uni*ue moral call# is in de"eloing the idea further along the lines of the Scotist notion of the haecceitas # or -this/ness# of the indi"idual erson. 9  3ecognizing the henomenal  2ijhoff Publishers# 0;<=# 9;f> Gesammelte Werke Husserliana' (and ))VII: Aufsätze und Vorträe !"#%%$"#*+& # ed. Thomas 2enon and Hans 3ainer Se 45ordrecht: ?lu%er Academic Publishers# 0;=# 9@/9> and Gesammelte Werke Husserliana' (and  )))VII: Einleitun in die Ethik  # ed. Henning Peuc!er 45ordrecht: ?lu%er Academic Publishers# 9BB=# 9DB/D   Hua )))VII  F. 1or Scheler# see Ma) Scheler#  ,ormalism in  Ethics and -on$,ormal Ethics of Values # trans. and ed. Manfred S. 1rings and 3oger G. 1un! 4E"anston: 2orth%estern ni"ersit' Press# 0<=# ;;/9> and - Ordo Amoris # in  hiloso/hical Essa0s # trans. and ed. 5a"id 3. Gachterman 4E"anston: 2orth%estern ni"ersit' Press# 0<=# 0B@/.9 See# (ames &. Hart# Who One Is' (ook %: E)istenz  and Transcendental henomenolo0  3 gi"enness of the uni*ue iseit' or haecceitas  of the erson# and moreo"er# of the fact that this henomenon of m' indi"idualit' is gi"en to me as ha"ing a content %hich communicates m' uni*ue ersonal identit'# ro"ides a means for understanding the  ossibilit' of a genuine disco"er' of the ideal sense of m'self as a "alue/ossibilit'  besto%ing a call to the realization of m' highest "alue. +f# ho%e"er# %e are to understand Hart$s solution to the roblematic manner in %hich the henomenologists ose this  roblem# then it becomes necessar' to ro"ide a more e)licit henomenological disclosure of the general sense of Scotus$ notion of haecceitas # in order more full' to recognize the henomenological insight %hich this notion is caable of illuminating for us here. The reason for this is t%ofold.1irst# in site of his suggesti"e use of the term# Hart$s resentation of the roblem lac!s an e)licit# thematic in"estigation of haecceitas  %hich %ould further bolster his de"eloment of Husserl and Scheler$s henomenological ethics. Secondl'# and deeer than this# it is necessar' in light of the henomenological demands of Husserl$s  hilosoh' in the first lace. Husserl argues that our ordinar' usage of hilosohical terms or concets is generall' unconscious of the la'ers of meaning %hich contribute to the o"erall sense of the concets %hich %e emlo'. 8rdinaril'# such concets are onl' -assi"el' understood# or onl' understood to the e)tent necessar' to ma!e a concet functionall' alicable to e"er'da' rojects. Ho%e"er# if henomenolog' is to roceed in rigorous fashion# Husserl argues# it must ma!e that %hich is merel' assi"el' understood in e"er'da' life -self/e"ident for us no% b' going bac! and -reacti"ating the traditions %hich first instituted or de"eloed them in the first lace and b' bringing to light the 45ordrecht: Sringer# 9BB=# 9@<# 9# 0# and 9 for some of the most notable instances.  4  rimar' henomenological data %hich srcinall' furnished their self/e"idence.   Thus# if  henomenolog' is to ma!e use of a meaning/laden term such as haecceitas  b' emlo'ing it in a henomenological in"estigation of moral resonsibilit'# then it can onl' "alidl' do so b' returning to its Scotist srcins and b' ro"iding Scotus$ insight into indi"idualit' %ith a henomenological elucidation of its essential self/e"idence.5uns Scotus is often remembered in the histor' of hilosoh' for his contribution to the discussion of the roblem of indi"iduation# de"eloing a ne% frame%or! %ithin %hich to thin! indi"idualit' and uni*ueness.  Haecceitas # as Scotus describes it# is the - ultima realitas entis # or the -ultimate realit' of the being.   As Mar' Elizabeth +ngham argues# ho%e"er# haecceitas  as it functions in Scotus$ hilosoh' is more than just a metah'sical rincile of the indi"iduation of being and essence# but rather is an srcinal  rincile of moralit'. As +ngham %rites# for Scotus# -the objectIof moral science is not an abstract moral e)cellence# but instead# the erfection of the moral erson# D  %here this  erfection ta!es on uni*ue# indi"idual dimensions. 8n this understanding of the Scotist  Edmund Husserl# -The 8rigin of &eometr'# in The 1risis of Euro/ean 2ciences and Transcedental henomenolo0 # trans. and ed. 5a"id Carr 4E"anston: 2orth%estern ni"ersit' Press# 0<B=# D0. (ohn 5uns Scotus# Ordinatio  ++# d. # n. 0;; in +oannis 5uns Scoti# O/era omnia # Vol. <# ed. C. Jalic# C. Jarbaric# S. Juselic# J. Hechich# G. Modric# S. 2anni# 3. 3osini# S. 3uiz de Goizaga# and C. Saco AlarcKn 4CittL del Vaticano: T'is Pol'glottis Vaticanis# 0<=.D Mar' Elizabeth +ngham# C.S.(.# -(ohn 5uns Scotus: An +ntegrated Vision# in The  Histor0 of ,ranciscan Theolo0 # ed. ?enan J. 8sborne# 8.1.M. 4St. Jona"enture# 2: The 1ranciscan +nstitute# 0=# 9BD.  5  roblematic# one can discern an imortant structural similarit' bet%een the Scotist aroach to moral hilosoh' and the henomenological aroach of Husserl and Scheler briefl' articulated abo"e %hich might "er' %ell be of use to henomenological thought in e"en deeer %a's than Hart$s assing and une)amined uses of the term - haecceitas  might at first seem to indicate. @ +n this aer# + %ill argue that a henomenological elucidation of the Scotist 6  At this juncture# it might be %ondered %hether a discussion of the Scotist concet of haecceitas  in the conte)t of henomenolog' might be better ser"ed through an in"estigation in connection %ith Heidegger rather than Husserl or Scheler. +n articular# one might loo! to Heidegger$s  Habilitationschrift   in %hich he does indeed deal %ith the Scotist concet of haecceitas  see Martin Heidegger#  3ie 4ateorien$ und  (edeutunslehre des 3uns 2cotus  4TNbingen: Verlag "on (. C. J. Mohr 4Paul Siebec!=# 00@=# 0 and @<fF. Ho%e"er# Heidegger does not recognize haecceitas  as a moral concet# nor is his henomenolog' reared to de"elo it in this direction. 3ather# Heidegger interrets haecceitas  in terms of %hat he terms -facticit' See Theodore ?iesel# The Genesis of Heideer5s  Jeing and Time 4Jer!ele': ni"ersit' of California Press# 0=# 9BF. E"en if %e recognize the ultimate imortance of Heidegger$s earl' %or! on Scotus for the de"eloment of the later concets of authenticit' and inauthenticit' and subse*uentl' interret these as ethical categories7contrar' to Heidegger$s o%n intentions7inasmuch as authenticit' is concei"ed in oosition to the idea of a -fallenness in the -the' 4das Man=# such an ethics %ould onl' be caable of dealing %ith the moral imlications of the contrast bet%een indi"idual and sun!enness in  societ0 # not the essentiall' rior contrast bet%een indi"idualit' and commonalit' %here the idea of moral -e)cellence is concerned. +f an ethics of authenticit' is to be justified#
Advertisement
Related Documents
View more
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks